From a sector I'd never have thought to consider in regards to statistics and probability comes the opinion that the crime of the century was committed last November.
Would you have thought to check with bookmakers on the odds of a Kerry presidency, after all the bets had been collected?
Jim Lampley has -- check his post in the Huffington Post today: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/theblog/archive/2005/05/biggest-story-of-our-live.html
It begs the question as to who was betting on whom that dark day in November.
Shares of insurers were traded in unusual volume just before 9/11; were there any unusual bets before 11/2?
But we all know this isn't the real crime if the fix was in.
What do you make of Lampley's premise, that the bookmakers know the truth?